What are the key points in brief?
- NAD+ can be measured in whole blood with research methods1,2,3,4.
- NAD+ is regarded as unstable and difficult to measure in blood1. In plasma, the value depends on how the sample is processed5.
- According to a 2026 paper, normal blood values in humans are so far not well known3.
- The authors of a study of seven cohorts question the usefulness of the blood value as a marker of age or lifestyle4.
How is NAD+ measured in blood?
Studies measure NAD+ in whole blood with different methods:
- Enzymatic cycling assay and mass spectrometry in whole blood2
- Dried blood spot card with a few microliters of blood1
- Standardized measurement of several redox values from one whole-blood sample3
- Liquid chromatography with high-resolution mass spectrometry4
NAD+ and its precursors are unstable and difficult to measure in blood1. On a dried blood spot card, at least 85 percent of the value was retained for two weeks at 4 °C1.
In plasma, NAD+ is about 500 times lower than in certain white blood cells. Longer centrifugation and rapid braking of the centrifuge lowered the measured value5.
What does a single measured value tell you?
In a group of 1,518 adults, the mean whole-blood value was 33.0 ± 5.5 µmol/L. Men had higher values than women2. Such a mean describes a particular group. The study does not report it as a reference range for interpreting individual values.
According to a 2026 paper, normal values of NAD and related substances in humans are so far not well known3. A study with seven cohorts found the whole-blood value stable across age and under lifestyle interventions. The authors question the usefulness of the blood value as a marker of age or lifestyle4.
What does a rise after NR or NMN show?
NR and NMN reliably raise NAD-related values in blood. According to a review, this shows biological activity. Clinical efficacy for anti-aging and wellness remains open6.
How much the value rises differs from person to person. One study found a rise of four to six times after NAD+ boosters, depending on the person3.
What can an NAD+ measurement do in a doctor's appointment?
With persistent fatigue, a conversation, a physical examination and simple lab tests come first. According to a review, further tests are needed only with additional symptoms or findings7. An NAD+ measurement would hardly replace this work-up.
The French National Academy of Medicine does not consider measuring biological age advisable for clinical practice on current knowledge8.
More on the work-up is on the page What can lie behind fatigue before considering NAD+ infusions?.
Which sources does this page rely on?
- Matsuyama R et al. (2022). Stabilization and quantitative measurement of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide in human whole blood using dried blood spot sampling. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-022-04469-7
The study develops a simple measurement of NAD+ from a few drops of whole blood on dried blood spot cards. It is a methods study on calibration and sample stability. NAD+ stayed largely stable on the cards for a limited time, which may make measurement easier.
- Yang F et al. (2022). Association of Human Whole Blood NAD+ Contents With Aging. Frontiers in Endocrinology. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.829658
The study asks whether whole-blood NAD+ declines with age. It is a cross-sectional study of 1,518 adults from a community in China. A decline with age appeared only in men, which may point to differences between the sexes.
- Euro L et al. (2026). Dynamics of blood NAD and glutathione in health, disease, aging, and under NAD+-booster treatment. Redox Biology. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2026.104343
The study developed a standardised measurement of NAD and glutathione from a single whole-blood sample. It is a methods and cohort study with 299 healthy adults. Levels appeared stable with age and rose to a different extent from person to person under NAD+ boosters.
- Trętowicz MM et al. (2026). Human whole-blood NAD+ levels do not vary with age or lifestyle interventions. Nature Metabolism. DOI: 10.1038/s42255-026-01537-5
The study tests whether whole-blood NAD+ changes with age or with lifestyle interventions. It used a validated mass spectrometry method in seven independent cohorts. Levels stayed largely stable and changed with nicotinamide riboside, which may call into question blood NAD+ as a marker of ageing.
- Saqr AHA et al. (2024). Optimized protocol for quantification of extracellular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide: evaluating clinical parameters and pre-analytical factors for translational research. Frontiers in Medicine. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1278641
The study examines which steps in blood collection and sample handling affect the measurement of NAD+ in plasma. It is a pre-analytical study on human blood samples. Long or fast-braking centrifugation lowered the measured values, which suggests these steps should be standardised.
- Gallagher C, Emmanuel OO (2026). NAD⁺ supplementation for anti-aging and wellness: A PRISMA-guided systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence. Ageing Research Reviews. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2026.103057
The review asks what studies on NAD+ products show for ageing and well-being. It systematically assesses 113 studies, 33 of them in humans. NR and NMN may raise NAD levels and appear well tolerated, while a clinical benefit remains open, and suitable trials of NAD+ infusions were lacking.
- Maisel P, Baum E, Donner-Banzhoff N (2021). Fatigue as the Chief Complaint. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0192
The paper summarises how family doctors may assess persistent fatigue. It is a review based on a literature search. Its authors suggest that history, physical examination and simple laboratory tests may usually be enough, with further tests mainly when other findings point that way.
- Académie nationale de médecine (2026). Approche clinique de la longévité en bonne santé. Report of 13 January 2026, in French. www.academie-medecine.fr/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/RAPPORT-Approche-clinique-de-la-longevite-en-bonne-sante-APRES-VOTE.pdf
The report asks what medical practice can do today to support a long and healthy life. It is a position paper of the French National Academy of Medicine. Based on current knowledge, it does not recommend measuring biological age or using anti-ageing agents in practice and gives priority to lifestyle.